News
Blood, sweat and tears: Peter Lehmann Stonewell Shiraz 1987–2006
The story of Stonewell was summed up by Wigan as “a lot of blood, sweat, and tears.” Having formally established his eponymous winery in 1982, Peter Lehmann wanted to make a “Show Dry Red” in 1987. After all the red wines had been made, the best lot was picked out and put into American oak. The first two vintages of Stonewell were “made after the event, a selection of barrels after the vintage,” explained Wigan, though for subsequent vintages fruit selection became an important aspect of the wines’s philosophy. “As far as we were concerned, until 1988, grapes grew on the back of trucks,” he quipped.
Stonewell Shiraz is, said Wigan, “by definition, the greatest Shiraz of the vintage at Lehmann.” The grapes are drawn mainly from old, low-yielding vineyards in the drier western areas of the Barossa Valley. The oldest contributor to Stonewell is the Schrapel vineyard in Ebenezer, planted in 1885. The youngest vineyard belongs to John Russell and was planted in 1992 in Kabininigie. Different growers are used each year because, said Wigan, “different vineyards come up in different years… We want to make our best expression of Barossa Shiraz, whatever that might be.”
From the 1996 vintage, French oak was used increasingly, settling on 90 percent from 2001 on. It has always been released at five years age. As Wigan pointed out, “it’s an expensive wine to make—French oak casks and five years of ageing.” Lehmann pays A$8,000 per tonne for Stonewell grapes compared to $1,500 for non-Stonewell, “so it is a great incentive for growers to pursue quality.”
A thousand dozen-bottle cases were made in the first three vintages, with production increasing to 3,500 cases in 1991 after the Jimmy Watson Trophy win for the 1989. 5,000 cases were made in 1998 and 2002, with the average about 2,500 in recent years.
Even Wigan admitted, “the early wines are quite simple and lack the complexity that we had from the mid-1990s on.” The older wines oxidized in the glass, losing any freshness they might have had at first, but there was not time to retaste. Overall, though, the wine was never over-extracted, over-alcoholic, or jammy.
Stonewell tasting
1987
Garnet colour. Leathery nose, but not overwhelmingly so. Still quite fresh for its age and provenance, with some dark, spicy fruit still there, too. A bit hollow in the mid-palate—dried out a bit? The tannins have smoothed out nicely, though there is a bit of acidity still apparent on the finish. Perfectly drinkable but probably past its best. Good, warming length. Drink up.
1988
A shade deeper than the 1987, and a brighter nose, too, with plenty of deep, dark Barossa fruit still apparent. Similar flavours on the palate, with the aged fruit showing nicely. The finish, though, is very tart and less satisfying and plump than the 1987. Drink up.
1989
colour as before. Lovely nose, fresher and more youthful than the 1988, with dark fruit aromas. Big, plump palate, much richer than the previous two wines, with a better balance of fruit and acidity, though there is a bit of an acidic kick on the finish. Perfectly mature—drink now. Winner of the Jimmy Watson Trophy for “best 1 year old dry red” at the 1990 Melbourne Wine Show and deserving of its reputation. This was the first vintage of Stonewell to be barrel fermented.
1990
Colour as before. A leaner, “cooler” nose than the 1989, much less generous and with a tiny hint of brett. Less plump than before, with more tannins, so again suggesting less ripeness. Indeed, at 12.5 percent this is a full degree lower in alcohol than the ’89. It gets better as it goes along, with good flavors on the finish. Drink now.
1991
Colour as before. Another lean example, with not much there these days. The palate is unbalanced, unappealing, and dominated by acidity. The tannins are still there and are not hard or extracted, but there is not enough fruit to support both those and that acidity. Acclaimed as a great Barossa vintage but this Stonewell is poor by comparison to the 1989 and 1990. Drink up.
1992
Colour as before, with a little bit more purple at the core. Dark chocolate nose, and again a tiny bit of brett. Some mint on the nose, too. A return to some stuffing in the wine, with the tannins a little bit chewy but not hard. Plenty of acidity again but it is in synch with the fruit. The finish is excellent—rich, flavoursome, and long. A good Stonewell, a bit fresher than 1989, so just beating that to be the best one yet. Drink now or age another 3+ years.
1993
More purple again, turning to garnet at the rim. A leaner style of nose again, smelling dried-out and not very appealing, with a tiny hint of brett and VA. The palate is better and similar to 1992, with some plump fruit, brisk acidity, silky tannins—a little more pronounced than 1992, perhaps, but more sinewy—and a long finish. Good, but a pity about the nose.
1994
Similar depth of colour to 1993, but less garnet. More youthful looking than any of the previous wines. Unappealing nose and palate, with too much acidity and not enough fruit. But there is some plump fruit on the finish, suggesting it might age longer yet and could open up into something more interesting and enjoyable. “1994 and 1996 will age better than 1987 or 1988,” reckoned Andrew Wigan.
1995
A shade deeper. Not much on the nose at the moment, but not as disappointing as 1994! Dry at the front of the mouth, and certainly less “sweet” than a few of the previous wines, with plenty of acidity, too. There are still some tannins to soften but these are typically and characteristically well-extracted and not hard. Not quite ready—drink now to 2014?
1996
A bit more purple at the core than before. The first wine that smells of young Barossa wine: dark chocolate, mint and eucalyptus, and a bit of leather that suggests maturity is not too far off. Fresh and vivid, with more tannins than any previous wine but these are silky and fine, even if the wine is far from ready on the palate. A rich, long finish confirms this as the best one yet in this tasting. Drink now to 2015+? For this vintage of Stonewell French oak hogsheads were used for the first time for part of the fermentation and maturation.
1997
More purple again. Totally different to 1996. A bit closed but it feels older on the nose! Much more generous on the palate, presenting a big mouthful of tannin, not hard but certainly bigger and more extracted than previous wines. The finish is rich and long. Another good Stonewell. Age to 2015+? The amount of French oak used increased to 64 percent for this vintage.
1998
Deep purple, opaque at the core. Rich, ripe, and sweet fruit on the palate, though with less conspicuous tannins than with the 1997. Like Peter Lehmann himself, this is big and generous, as per 1989. The nose quite challenging at the moment, though—quite closed and a bit acetic. Drink now to 2015? Andrew Wigan remembered 1998 as “an amazing vintage. Everything on the tasting bench was black.” French oak was again increased to 70%.
1999
Not quite as deep in colour as the 1998. As with the 1998, the nose is difficult and not very expressive at the moment. The palate is much leaner than before, not as sweet or generous, and with less of a punch on the finish. Drink now to 2013?
2000
Colour as before, tinged by garnet at the rim. A tobacco note on the nose, but not yet fully open and developed. A return to the plump, rich palate style of 1994 and before, with very well-amalgamated tannins, nice acidity, excellent balance, and good length. A very good Stonewell. Drink now to 2015? The same oak regime as for the 1999—73 percent French and 27 percent American oak hogsheads for 18 months.
2001
Colour as before. Creamy-oak nose, very lush and enticing, as is the palate, which is full of generous, opulent fruit and some tannins to add interest to the lush fruit texture. Very sexy and moreish. Drink now to 2015—but probably at its best now for that lush fruit. French oak settled at 90 percent for this vintage, the remaining 10 percent American.
2002
Deep purple core. The nose recalls the mint and eucalyptus of 1996—only more so! Lovely and very appealing. Rich, sweet fruit, with some oak tannins still apparent at the moment, but perfectly drinkable already. Age to 2017+ for softer tannins and more complexity.
2003
A bit more purple, more closed, and less opulent than 2002. More open and generous on the palate, however, with deep, rich fruit and some oak flavours and tannins still perceptible, but overall a lush texture. Good. Age to 2020?
2004
Viscous deep purple. Closed, but a little bit raisiny on the nose. Still young and not yet harmonized on the palate, with some oak grip still apparent. But the balance is there and suggests ageworthiness. Too young to drink now with real pleasure. 2012–2020+?
2005
Colour as before, but a shade deeper. Prunes rather than raisins on the nose, which again hints at late-picked, very ripe fruit. A bit of toasty oak is also still apparent. Very lush and approachable on the palate, though, and drinkable now, with its very supple and silky tannins. Now to 2020? To be released in 2009 as the first Stonewell bottled under Stelvin. “When using screw cap it is imperative that the wine is absolutely free from any reductive characters prior to bottling because these will be magnified under screw cap,” explained Andrew. “However, this is standard practice for good winemakers, regardless of whether they are bottling under screw cap or cork.”
2006
Bright ruby purple. Less raisiny on the nose than 2005 or 2004 and better for it, showing some of the vividness and brightness of the ’96. Rich, ripe and generous, albeit with very youthful flavours at the moment, so age to 2020+ for more interest. Excellent balance and a punchy finish. To be released in 2010. As a point of comparison with the inaugural Stonewell, the 2006 has 6.83 g/ltr of acidity; a pH level of 3.46; and alcohol at 14.5 percent. The 1987 has 6.39 g/ltr acidity; pH at 3.29; and an alcohol level of 13 percent.