My Today

    All of the tasting notes of the wine critic mentioned above in tastingbook, comes from press releases from wine importers and vineyards, or directly from the critic and can also be found on the critic’s own website, which can be easily accessed by clicking on the link above.


    My Yesterday

    The Absurdity and Flattery of Scores

    I am a wine critic. And so, of course, I am called on to judge the quality of thousands of different wines every year. Not just to describe them or to give an opinion on their quality but also to score them and rank them in a league table. And that’s where the trouble starts.


    It doesn't take a genius to appreciate the absurdity of giving a number score to a work of art or, worse still, an artist. Salvador Dalí had huge fun scoring great artists (including himself) on the basis of design, color, and composition-but that says far more for his sense of provocation and irony than it does for the principle itself. When it comes to wine, alas, US wine critics, starting with Robert Parker, have convinced us that awarding an absolute score out of 100-to any wine, regardless of year or country of origin-is not only possible but actually in the best interests of the consumer. No one doubts that such scores mean something to a palate as discerning as the Maryland guru's, but only a mind reader could understand the tiny nuances that distinguish an average-vintage California Merlot awarded 89 points from a greatvintage sweet South African wine awarded 88 points.


    Absolute flattery

    The fact is, an absolute score serves only to flatter the self-esteem of wealthy buyers. It must be a real ego trip to know that you can afford the perfection of a wine rated 100/100. The rest of us must, meanwhile, surf the top-scoring options in search of wines within our price range. The sooner a critic awards that score-to the newly made wine (why not?) or, better still, within one or two years of bottling-the more useful it is for that huge army of budding speculators looking to buy the latest vintage at the right price, whether to drink it themselves or, increasingly these days, to sell it on to buyers in Asia and elsewhere.

    Then there is the other kind of wine critic, who admits that their scores are quite obviously relative, understandable only in the context of a particular type of wine, a particular vintage, and, indeed, a particular preference (meaning you personally prefer the wine awarded 90 points to the wine awarded 88 points). Such critics are accused of cowardice, of being unable to do their duty courageously for the benefit of their public. They are reproached by the average consumer for assigning more or less the same score every year to the same (good) wines made by the same (good) producers. We may well point out, however, that this is only natural, given a consistent quality of production that in good years or bad brings out the best in the vintage and the terroir. Idiots will simply see this as a veiled admission that we are in the pay of those producers. They insist that even if we won't or can't give an absolute score to the wine, then we could at least award an absolute score to the vintage to help people understand our scores from one vintage to another. But that's just as pointless-and equally impossible. How do you award points to a vintage?

    Do you base it on the value of the worst wines, or the best wines, or the average value of the wines tasted, or the average of the average? You could use computers, I suppose. But what use is that when trying to determine how much pleasure a wine will give when it reaches drinkability, which for wines from the greatest vineyards is definitely not going to be on the day of tasting? A skilled taster will, indeed, predict the likely evolution of a young wine and give a "prognostication" (the only way to put it) about how good it will be once it is fully mature- a maturity that might come to pass five years, or 10 years, or sometimes 20 years after this first tasting.


    What right to judge?

    And it doesn't end there. As scary as it is, there is only one question worth asking when the voices of contradiction can't agree among themselves: "By what right do we declare one wine, one terroir, or one method of fermentation to be better than another?" Conventional wisdom doesn't help here, since it's invariably tainted by ideology. If you say, for instance, that it's better to buy minor wines from a great vintage than great wines from a minor vintage, that will be anathema to anyone who doesn't believe in a hierarchy of terroirs. But it's even worse if you take the opposite position-that it's better to buy great wines from minor vintages because they will always be more elegant than small wines from great vintages, and more reasonably priced, too!

    All of which goes to show that a whole bunch of arithmetic scores is not the way to educate consumers about wine. What we critics have to do is teach people to compare their tasting sensibilities with our own. This starts by helping consumers to discover what they like or what they are seeking based on the reviews that we provide. It does not mean spoon-feeding them with ready-made critical evaluations on the misguided assumption that they are too lazy to digest the information themselves. A difficult duty, for sure-but it's our duty nonetheless!


    My Tomorrow

    Did Someone Say “Classification”?

    Wine buffs just love official wine classifications, especially French ones. So do the producers-among the top Médoc and Burgundy growths, anyway. It is easy to see why: Classifications push up the prices of their wines and land. But the whole thing takes on a nightmare quality as recent classifications come up for review. The squabbling over the Médoc crus bourgeois has exhausted the patience of even the best-intentioned regulators; and two years of wrangling by the crus classés have made a laughing stock of the St-Emilion classification.

    The latest ruling by the French courts entitles properties listed under the 1996 rating process (the penultimate classification) to display their ranking on their labels. But this is only until a new ranking can be drafted, which wouldn't be necessary if the latest classification (2006) had been drawn up properly.

    That producers should want classification at all is suspicious. Everyone is in favor of ranking but only on condition that no one gets left out. Those who aren't promoted or are demoted will use every legal means at their disposal to have the new classification annulled. The slightest failure to observe the letter of the law, and the new ranking will be deemed void by the courts. Lawyers will meanwhile talk up the distress suffered by the also-rans, pointing out the heavy financial penalties in store. According to even the most conservative estimates, a cru classé promoted to premier cru can expect to double the price of its wines in just two years and triple the value of its vineyard land; a demoted cru faces losing half of both its value and its customers.

    A bigger worry, though, is the philosophy that underpins this sort of classification. There is no justification for a system cobbled together from two conflicting sets of principles: on the one hand, the producer-driven Bordeaux model, based on a château's reputation and trading price; on the other, the vineyard-driven Burgundy classification.

    The 1855 Classification for Bordeaux red wines is founded on the name of the château. These rankings have remained unchanged ever since, no matter how much those châteaux may have increased or reduced their vineyard holdings. It is unfair that 1ha (2.47 acres) of Pauillac purchased by Château Latour will increase in value tenfold-significantly more than if purchased by Château Pédesclaux, and unimaginably more than if purchased by the La Rose Pauillac wine cooperative. But price is one thing and quality is another. A cru classé that wants to consolidate its position must commit to wine of uncompromising quality. However much its vineyard expands, its performance will always be up to the mark. Any newly acquired plot that fails to deliver will be declassified by the owner, even though the land may hold its price. This explains the longevity of the 1855 Classification and why it is still trusted. It was naive of the St-Emilion crus to think they could break with commercial wisdom and imagine this sort of injustice could be avoided by insisting on official approval before any cru classé could expand its vineyard.

    Remember when Beau-Séjour Bécot was demoted for allegedly introducing an incompatible terroir to the mix? But who decides whether a cru should be promoted or demoted? On what objective criteria is soil classified and defined as grand or premier cru? And, scientifically speaking, does anyone understand those criteria? Referring to the Burgundy classification is pointless because Burgundy has never been ranked on the basis of terroir (meaning "agricultural land") but according to climats (meaning "vineyards"). These are two different concepts: a terroir is an accident of nature, but the Burgundy crus (as in Bordeaux) are man-made.

    What they understood in Burgundy but largely failed to grasp in Bordeaux is that soil is not the only criterion. So, they added others, such as the position of the vineyard on the slope and its exposure to sunshine, wind, and rain. These enduring criteria, proved in turn by the taste of the wines, are what defined the official boundaries of the Burgundy climats today. The consistent character of the wines, in the hands of conscientious owners, has produced a precise classification that nobody questions.

    Bordeaux undoubtedly has climats of its own, but the wines they produce are blended. Blended wines from a variety of plots may well be more complex, consistent, and original than those from isolated parcels. But since quality in this case is determined by human choice, the individuality of these crus is much more difficult to classify. What blind-tasting expert can claim that one château bottling is always better than another?

    Who could name the St-Emilion crus classés and, in the same vintage, months or years later, still rank them in the right order? How many times have the producers of these wines actually failed to recognize them? Are we to trust expert brokers and enologists more than consumers? The judgments of the former are clouded by conflicts of interest; the latter are too unsure of themselves to go with genuine emotions that contradict traditional rankings. In the end, only the market can provide a respectable basis for the ranking and pricing of the Bordeaux crus, because only the market covers every possible angle of wine production and trade- and represents the greatest diversity of tastes and opinions. They understood that back in 1855, and they still understand it in Pomerol. Will they now understand that lesson elsewhere?



    Michel Bettane is a leading French wine critic, and for twenty years, a writer for the French consumer wine publication La Revue du vin de France. He left La Revue in 2004 to work for the rivaling wine publication Le Classement des Meilleurs Vins de France.[2] He now runs his own website.

    Following the acquisition of La Revue du vin de France by Marie-Claire and media group Lagardère, Bettane and his colleague Thierry Desseauve left the publication on grounds of editorial differences, and the two launched their own series of wine guides, Le Classement des Meilleurs Vins de France. Bettane also appears in publications such as Le MondeDecanter and The World of Fine Wine.

    Bettane is credited with coining the term "vin de garage" and its winemakers "garagistes".

    In an interview with Swiss newspaper Le Temps Bettane stated that wine critics are "not gurus", and stated that criticisms by Jonathan Nossiter in his book Le Goût et le Pouvoir were "infantile".

    Read More

Wine Moments

Here you can see wine moments from tastingbook users. or to see wine moments from your world.

Michel Bettane/BWW2024 Finalist, Wine Writer (France)  had a tasting of  18 Wines  from  12 Producers 

Château Suduiraut 2010 /Super nose with some exotic pineapple/mango/passion fruit undertones mixed with Vouvray-like blossom-tree and quince jelly, enormous body, but incredible purity and crystal-like transparency, great length, a masterpiece! Drink 2020-2070.

12h 25min ago

Michel Bettane/BWW2024 Finalist, Wine Writer (France)  had a tasting of  60 Wines  from  58 Producers 

TOP Wines - Bordeaux 2023 vintage.

17d 13h ago

Cheval Blanc 2023, Château Cheval Blanc
Le Pin 2023, Le Pin
Les Forts de Latour 2023, Château Latour
Château Latour 2023, Château Latour
Pétrus 2023, Château Pétrus
Lafite-Rothschild 2023, Château Lafite-Rothschild
Château Margaux 2023, Château Margaux
Château Haut-Brion 2023, Château Haut-Brion
Château Ausone 2023, Château Ausone
Château Mouton-Rothschild 2023, Château Mouton-Rothschild
Château Palmer 2023, Château Palmer
Château Smith Haut Lafitte 2023, Château Smith Haut Lafitte
Château Smith Haut Lafitte Blanc 2023, Château Smith Haut Lafitte
Lafleur 2023, Château Lafleur
La Mission Haut Brion 2023, Château La Mission Haut-Brion
Pavie 2023, Château Pavie
L'Eglise-Clinet 2023, Château L'Eglise-Clinet
Château Cos d'Estournel 2023, Château Cos d'Estournel
Léoville-Las Cases 2023, Château Léoville-Las Cases
Château Suduiraut 2023, Château Suduiraut
Château L´Evangile 2023, Château L´Evangile
Sigalas-Rabaud 2023, Château Sigalas-Rabaud
Château Rieussec 2023, Château Rieussec
Château de Valandraud 2023, Château Valandraud
Château Gruaud-Larose 2023, Château Gruaud-Larose
Château Angelus 2023, Château Angelus
La Dominique 2023, La Dominique
Château de Rayne Vigneau 2023, Château de Rayne Vigneau
Château Canon 2023, Château Canon
Château Canon-La-Gaffelière 2023, Château Canon-La-Gaffelière
Château La Fleur-Pétrus 2023, Château Lafleur-Pétrus
Château Coutet 2023, Château Coutet
Château Pichon-Longueville Baron 2023, Château Pichon-Longueville Baron
Trotanoy 2023, Château Trotanoy
Chateau Ducru-Beaucaillou 2023, Château Ducru-Beaucaillou
Château Phelan-Segur 2023, Château Phelan-Segur
Château Pontet Canet 2023, Château Pontet Canet
Château Batailley 2023, Château Batailley
Château Lascombes 2023, Château Lascombes
Château Giscours 2023, Château Giscours
Domaine de Chevalier Blanc 2023, Domaine de Chevalier
Château Malartic-Lagraviere Blanc 2023, Château Malartic-Lagraviere
Château Guiraud 2023, Château Guiraud
Château Climens 2023, Château Climens
Château Trottevieille 2023, Château Trottevieille
Château Troplong-Mondot 2023, Château Troplong-Mondot
Château de Figeac 2023, Château de Figeac
Château La Conseillante 2023, Château La Conseillante
Le Dôme 2023, Le Dome
La Mondotte 2023, La Mondotte
Château Léoville Poyferré 2023, Château Léoville Poyferré
Château Nenin 2023, Château Nenin
Château Hosanna 2023, Château Hosanna
Château Violette 2023, Château La Violette
Tertre Roteboeuf 2023, Château Tertre Roteboeuf
Château La Tour Blance 2023, Château La Tour Blance
Bélair Monange 2023, Château Bélair Monange
Château Larcis Ducasse 2023, Château Larcis Ducasse
Château Pavie-Macquin 2023, Château Pavie-Macquin
L'If 2023, L'If
Château Lafite-Rothschild, Bordeaux, France
Château Canon, Bordeaux, France
Château Giscours, Bordeaux, France
La Dominique, Bordeaux, France
Château Nenin, Bordeaux, France
Château L'Eglise-Clinet , Bordeaux, France
Château Guiraud, Bordeaux, France
Château Malartic-Lagraviere, Bordeaux, France
Château de Rayne Vigneau, Bordeaux, France
La Mondotte, Bordeaux, France
Château Rieussec, Sauternes, France
Château Troplong-Mondot, Bordeaux, France
Château Trottevieille, Bordeaux, France
Château de Figeac, Bordeaux, France
Château Mouton-Rothschild, Bordeaux, France
Château Tertre Roteboeuf, Bordeaux, France
Château Léoville-Las Cases, Saint-Julien, France
Château Léoville Poyferré, Bordeaux, France
Château Phelan-Segur, Bordeaux, France
Château Batailley, Pauillac, France
Château Lascombes, Bordeaux, France
Château Palmer, Bordeaux, France
Château Cheval Blanc, Bordeaux, France
Château Pichon-Longueville Baron, Bordeaux, France
Château Latour, Bordeaux, France
Château Valandraud, Bordeaux, France
Le Dome, Bordeaux, France
Château Angelus, Bordeaux, France
Château Bélair Monange, Bordeaux, France
Château Lafleur, Bordeaux, France
Le Pin, Bordeaux, France
Château Haut-Brion, Bordeaux, France
Château Larcis Ducasse, Bordeaux, France
Château Trotanoy, Bordeaux, France
Château La Violette, Bordeaux, France
Château Smith Haut Lafitte, Bordeaux, France
Château La Conseillante, Bordeaux, France
Château Pavie-Macquin, Bordeaux, France
Château Hosanna, Bordeaux, France
Château Ducru-Beaucaillou, Bordeaux, France
L'If, Bordeaux, France
Château La Tour Blance, Sauternes, France
Château Lafleur-Pétrus, Bordeaux, France
Château Margaux, Bordeaux, France
Château Sigalas-Rabaud, Bordeaux, France
Château Pétrus, Pomerol, France
Château Canon-La-Gaffelière, Bordeaux, France
Château Suduiraut, Bordeaux, France
Château Pontet Canet, Bordeaux, France
Château Cos d'Estournel, Bordeaux, France
Château Gruaud-Larose, Bordeaux, France
Château Coutet, Sauternes, France
Château L´Evangile, Pomerol, France
Château Climens, Bordeaux, France
Château Pavie, Bordeaux, France
Domaine de Chevalier, Pessac Leognan, France
Château Ausone, Bordeaux, France
Château La Mission Haut-Brion, Bordeaux, France

Michel Bettane/BWW2024 Finalist, Wine Writer (France)  had a tasting of  10 Wines  from  10 Producers 

CHÂTEAU PALMER 1928 / Before the Merlots planted under the influence of the Miailhe family typified the cru as we know it today and made it so admired, Palmer was undoubtedly planted with more traditional grape varieties. Or at least closer to that of Château Margaux. Tasted on several occasions, this grandiose 1928 has always left me with unforgettable memories. The last one was during a vertical tasting at the château in the presence of Thomas Duroux, its brilliant director. But there was also the estate’s legendary 1961, which has done so much for its glory. While this vintage, for all its generosity of texture, was beginning to show signs of fatigue, this was not the case with the 1928. On every criterion of aromatic nobility, wine building on the palate, strength and originality of expression of the best Margaux soils, it crushed the 1961, but also most of the other vintages, by its naturalness and grandeur. As we know, the 1928s were admired for their potential right from the start, but they took a long time to make, longer than the 1929s. Many of them now have minor analytical deviations from the formal perfection of our best recent wines. In the case of this bottle, there were none, which says a lot about the skill of the men in the cellar at the time. I know it’s hard to believe in so much superiority or authority in such an old wine. But if you’re lucky enough to drink one that’s so well preserved, you’ll quickly realise that the great Médocs are a glory of our viticulture. It hardly deserves the stupid French bashing it receives from our astonishing elites.

4m 8d ago

Michel Bettane/BWW2024 Finalist, Wine Writer (France)  had a tasting of  13 Wines  from  13 Producers 

Petrus 2018 / A Petrus of great dimension with a structure that gains in finesse with the passing weeks and an aromatic scope delivering spices, pepper, iris, marshmallow, violet. Alluring and shining tannins. A legendary vintage for the cru.

99 points

9m 16d ago

Upgrade your membership now, it's quick and easy. We use PayPal, the world's largest payment system, it accepts all credit cards. Once you've chosen your membership level, you'll go directly to PayPal. You can cancel your membership at any time.
Thank you for your support!

Pro Member


Winemerchant Member


Winery Member





We recommend you to share few minutes for watching the following video instructions of how to use the Tastingbook. This can provide you a comprehensive understanding of all the features you can find from this unique service platform.

This video will help you get started

Taste wines with the Tastingbook

Create Your wine cellar on 'My Wines'

Explore Your tasted wines library

Administrate Your wine world in Your Profile

Type a message ...
Register to Tastingbook
Sign up now, it's quick and easy.
We use PayPal, the world's largest payment system, it accepts all credit cards.
Once you've chosen your membership level, you'll go directly to PayPal, where you can sign up for a free 7-day trial period. You can cancel your membership at any time. We wish you a rewarding journey to the world of Fine Wines.

Free 7 days Member trial




Pro Member


Winemerchant Member


Winery Member